Who Killed Betty Van Patter? (part 7)
Questions arise over the role of Huey P. Newton
Four days after Betty Van Patter’s body was identified in January 1975, Berkeley Police Officer Dave Frederick contacted John Conomos of the U.S. Geological Survey in an attempt to understand the probable drift of the body in the bay.
Conomos told Frederick that the average net drift of anything caught up in the tidal action from the central bay region, which would include Berkeley, Oakland and San Francisco, would be about a mile and a half to a mile and three-quarters a day south towards San Jose.
That Betty’s remains were found near Foster City was therefore consistent with her body having been dumped somewhere in the central bay region.
Within days of identifying Betty as a murder victim, the Berkeley Police held an interview with Elaine Brown and Joan Kelley of the Black Panther Party, as well as their lawyer, Charles Garry.
Kelley was the EOC official who supervised Betty’s work and issued her paychecks. She told police she generally saw Betty about once a week at the Panther school when she was dropping off or picking up papers related to her work.
For her part, Brown insisted to the detectives that she fired Betty a week before she disappeared, on December 6th. The police noted in their files that this was contradicted by all known evidence. Strangely, Brown then added that she ran into Betty unexpectedly at the Lamp Post and spoke “briefly” with her “one weekend evening” after December 6th.
The evidence indicated that Elaine fired Betty on the 13th, not the 6th. And it seems most likely, though not conclusive, that the night of December 13th was the time that Elaine would have seen Betty at the Lamp Post and spoken with her. It also is logical to think that Betty would have gone there to meet Elaine, courtesy of the note handed to her by the man at the Berkeley Square.
These details matter. We believe Betty was at the Lamp Post the night of the 13th. That is the last place she was seen. But we don’t know why she went there.
Before the police got an opportunity to ask Brown more questions that might have shed light on these matters, her attorney, Charles Garry, terminated the interview.
And that effectively concluded the most active part of the investigation into the murder case by the Berkeley Police. They did not have enough evidence to arrest anyone for the murder of Betty Van Patter. They suspected Elaine Brown knew more than she told them, but they couldn’t force her to talk. But it is reasonable to say that she at least could have been much more helpful in solving the case had she wanted to be.
Over the weeks and months to follow, police did track down and interview many of the people who had known Betty over the relevant time period. The consistent picture that emerged was that she had seemed excited to be working for the Panthers, admired Brown, but was concerned about some of the financial irregularities she witnessed, especially at the Lamp Post, and was trying to get things cleaned up to save the party from possible legal troubles.
The police did not seem to delve very deeply into any alternative scenario – such as her love life or a stranger killing. They did follow various leads that went nowhere, such as the identity of the man who talked to Betty and handed her a note at the Berkeley Square the night she disappeared. Despite numerous conversations with witnesses, rumors and leads, they were never able to identify this man.
As the months went by, new entries to the case file started tapering off, and eventually all activity on the case ceased completely. Thus it joined the many other cold cases that remain unresolved year after year, decade after decade, perhaps forever.
David Horowitz, meanwhile, publicly completed his odd personal transformation from a prominent leftist into an outspoken advocate of ludicrous right-wing ideas, and in interviews, said that Betty’s murder had been a major precipitating factor behind his political conversion.
Perhaps he had good intentions, but Horowitz’s protestations hardly helped solve the case. Rather, he only succeeded in politicizing the matter.
Then again, almost single-handedly for decades, Horowitz kept Betty’s case from fading completely from the limelight. He mentioned it in his speeches and articles. And significantly, in 1995, he published a long article by Kate Coleman in Heterodoxy, a journal of his non-profit Center for the Study of Popular Culture.
In that article, Coleman named who she believed ordered the murder and who did it. She also described attending a bookstore reading in Berkeley, when Elaine Brown was promoting her autobiography, “A Taste of Power.” During the question period, Coleman asked Brown whether she was in touch with Newton while he was in exile in Cuba, including the period when Betty was killed.
“Quite a bit, in fact,” Brown answered after an initial hesitation. “And I have the phone bills to prove it because he would call collect. It was costing me three and four thousand dollars a month!” Coleman surmised this was a highly relevant admission when it came to who within the Panther hierarchy might have ordered Betty to be killed.
Given her statement, Coleman knew that it had to be entertained that perhaps it was Huey Newton who had ordered Betty’s murder. But Newton couldn’t be questioned because he was dead, having been gunned down in 1989 by a young man trying to impress the Black Guerrilla Family, a narcotics prison gang, on the streets of Oakland.
(Part Eight will appear tomorrow.)
**********************
NOTE: Holiday Special Offer: Give a gift subscription to this newsletter to a loved one at a 25% discounted rate!
***********************
HEADLINES:
Elon Musk leads charge to kill spending bill meant to avert government shutdown (NBC)
CNN commentator Scott Jennings received swift backlash after he went on a tirade about Caitlin Clark's recent comments about white privilege. But why are conservatives so angered by the WNBA star's remarks? Experts weigh in. [HuffPost]
Fed cuts interest rates a third time, points to inflation as challenge for 2025 (WP)
Disney’s Decision to Settle Trump Defamation Suit Prompts Backlash at ABC News (WSJ)
This year’s school shootings in numbers: 31,000 children affected across 21 states (WP)
Key takeaways from MLB report on pitcher injuries (MLB.com)
In reversal, key House panel votes to release Matt Gaetz ethics report (CNN)
Trump pushes for FBI probe of Republican Liz Cheney over Jan. 6 panel (Reuters)
Supreme Court to hear challenge to banning TikTok in the United States (WP)
Behind Germany’s Political Turmoil, a Stagnating Economy (NYT)
China’s Slowdown Has Changed the Trade War (Foreign Affairs)
Russia detained an Uzbek man who had confessed to planting and detonating a bomb which killed a top general, Igor Kirillov. In a video, the unnamed suspect is shown saying he had come to Moscow at the orders of Ukraine's intelligence services. (Reuters)
Does Trump want Putin to get Ukraine’s $26 trillion in gas and minerals? (WP)
A third of psychologists won't take insurance: survey (Axios)
‘He kept going until he couldn’t’: why do boomer men refuse to slow down? (Guardian)
OpenAI brings ChatGPT to your landline (TechCrunch)
X Rolls Out Updates to Its Grok AI Chatbot (SocialMediaToday)
CEO Motivates Self By Keeping Own Photo On Desk (The Onion)