Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Jameson's avatar

I agree, and from what I know our asteroid detection system is very lacking. However, the Starship might be be great for launching space telescopes dedicated to this purpose. As far as deflecting an asteroid, the starship again would probably be the best option as it's all about payload capacity and thrust. I don't think it would take a major program to have some Starships equipped for this. However, I think his Mars habitation idea is impractical. Mars really isn't that much different from the moon in all the bad ways: radiation, bleakness, and practically a vacuum. But at least the moon is much much closer. Better chances for permanent, self-sustaining colony on the moon (not that this would be easy either) unless you geoengineer Mars with nukes... and then maybe a breathable atmosphere appears at some point 500 years later. Hmmm, maybe do both....;-)

Expand full comment
Michael Kepp's avatar

David, if billionaires like Musk and Bezos, only interested in further inflating their egos, were really interested in protecting Earth’s population from mass ecocide, they wouldn’t be investing in planetary exit routes like inhabiting Mars, but in ways to detect and deflect the trajectory of asteroids, because the government has not invested anywhere near enough in doing so, as astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson has repeatedly warned.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts